Thursday, February 28, 2008

Azerbaijan fears Kosovo Example

Azerbaijan is afraid that Nagorno-Karabakh will follow the Kosovo example and declare independence. Armenians are conflicted, knowing that the Kosovo declaration with EU and US support is a violation of UN 1244 and other agreements, and Armenians are sympathetic with the Serbs. The two situations are very similar. Albanians have used deceit, ethnic cleansing and mass murder to seize Kosovo. Azerbaijan used deceit to get Stalin to gift the Armenian provinces Nagorno-Karabakh and Nakhchivan to them, and in the 1990's ethnic cleansing and mass murder.

Kosovo is Serbian. Nagorno-Karabakh and Nakhchivan are Armenian.

Is this crazy, or is this crazy?

By Melanie Phillips

"The decision by Britain, America and certain other European countries to recognise Kosovo as an independent state is mind-blowingly stupid and suicidal and of a piece with their obvious determination to capitulate in the war for civilisation."

“{the Kosovo declaration of independence} asserts that religion matters more than nationality. This is multiculturalism taken to its lunatic natural conclusion. It says in effect that nationality is not the glue that must bind people of different creeds together, but religion or ethnicity can be allowed to break the nation apart. Every nation with restive ethnic minorities will now be undermined by this endorsement of illegal Balkanisation.”

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Expect stupid thinking on the Balkans

Response to “Expect the Worst in the Balkans” by Dr Paul Kengor published on

It is amazing that Dr Paul Kengor with the Hoover Institution can write an article with so many glaring inaccuracies, too numerous to completely refute here. He trips up early on, accusing Milosevic of calling for a greater Serbia. Even a read of the US Government translation of the speech will disprove that accusation. Kengor enjoys calling Serbs ‘goons’ and ‘butchers’. He refers to the creation of Yugoslavia as a deformed by-product when in fact its creation was supported by the US as a bulwark against German adventurism in the Balkans (a policy that Clinton discarded). He says nothing about German support for the Croatian fascists and KLA jihadists, a German policy supported by the US. He takes a poke at the Russians (a habit of cold-warriors) when they didn’t pour gasoline on the breakup of Yugoslavia unlike Germany and the US. He mistakenly accuses Serbia of starting four wars. What is he talking about? Is he referring to the Yugoslavian federal army that was unarmed and left Croatia? Is he talking about the civil war in Kosovo, started by the KLA supported and trained by German special operations? He refers to Milosevic as an ethnic cleanser. Where did it happen? Not in Croatia where the Krajina Serbs were cleansed backed up by the US and Germany. Not in Bosnia. Not in Kosovo were only about 2400 bodies have been recovered from the civil war, about evenly split between Muslims and Serbs. He refers to US troops in Kosovo to keep the peace while the Muslims make further progress on cleansing Kosovo of Serbs, Jews, Turks, and Roma. This is the short list.

He is right just once when he says that ‘The region is the graveyard of hopes and dreams’. He must be referring to himself.

(Read Article)

Teflon Obama took Millions from Billionaire Nadhni Auchi

By Atlas Shrugs

"A British-Iraqi billionaire lent millions of dollars to Barack Obama's fundraiser just weeks before an imprudent land deal that has returned to haunt the presidential contender, an investigation by The Times discloses."

Obama, not African-American

By Kenneth E. Lamb

"Federal law requires that to claim a minority status, you must be at least 1/8 of the descriptor, but for the sake of this article, I’ve converted it to a decimal fraction for easier comprehension. You must be at least 12.5% of the racial component you claim for minority status. Mr. Obama, claiming to be African-American, is half the legal threshold."

"Again, to let it sink in: Mr. Obama is not legally African-American. It is impossible for him to be, in truth, America’s first African-American president."

The Muslim Accomplishments That Weren’t

In fourteen centuries Islam has taught the virtues of the sword and otherwise has contributed nearly nothing positive to advance civilized humanity except for what passed through it from other civilizations.

Read The Muslim Accomplishments That Weren’t interview with Peter BetBasoo, co-founder and director of the Assyrian International News Agency. In 2007, he authored the report, Incipient Genocide: The Ethnic Cleansing of the Assyrians of Iraq.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Bat Ye'or on Obama

From Phyllis Chesler at Chester Chronicles:

"My friend and colleague, the scholar Bat Ye’or told me that if Obama is elected, America will become dhimmified even faster than Europe."

Saturday, February 23, 2008

America, declining, paves the way

It may seem that there is not a significant Russian response to the Kosovo declaration of independence but after the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 it turned away from the West and joined into strategic alliance with China, a turn that most in the West didn’t pay attention to then and are not paying attention to now. The West is going to pay a catastrophic price in the future for failing in the 1990’s to bring Russia into the Western alliance. It’s already starting to pay the price but is still in denial. In 2008 the US and EU again stick their fingers into the eyes of Serbia and Russia and don't expect them to draw obvious conclusions or to respond.

America in the 1990’s broke with a long standing policy dating back to Woodrow Wilson to support Yugoslavia as a bulwark against German expansionism. Germany already dominates the EU and the emerging EU army. By America’s support for execution of German policies in Yugoslavia the path has been cleared of obstacles to Germany’s reemergence as a world power. Furthermore, in two phases America cleared the path for Iran to emerge as a world power: first, led by Jimmy Carter whose policies led to the success of the Islamic Revolution in Iran; second, led by George Bush who eliminated the Taliban and Saddam Hussein, Iran’s enemies in the region.

In two world wars Germany allied itself with and supported Islamic jihadists and mass murder.

- In WW1 it encouraged its allies the Turks to commit genocide of the Armenian Christians.

- In WW2 it committed genocide of the Jews, supported fascist Croatians and fascist Albanians in their genocide of Jews, Serbs, and Roma, and in the Middle East supported the Muslim Brotherhood in acts of violence and murder of Jews.

At the end of the twentieth century Germany with US backing actively supported and encouraged the Islamic jihad (KLA) and its ethnic cleansing and mass murder of Serbs, Jews, and Roma, and it supported the reemergence of fascist Croatia and its cleansing of the Serb Krajina. Why shouldn’t we expect more of the same from Germany in the twenty-first century?

America is a declining world power that has cleared the way for the emergence of Germany and Iran as world powers, the resurgence of fascism and anti-Semitism in Europe, the success of the Islamic jihad in the Balkans, and a coming titanic conflict. American foreign policy at best can be described as anti-American and anti-Western.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Muhammad, Prophet of Doom

“The depiction of the prophet by the most revered Muslim sources reveals behavior that is immoral, criminal, and violent. The five oldest and most trusted Islamic sources don't portray Muhammad as a great and godly man. They confirm that he was a thief, liar, assassin, mass murderer, terrorist, warmonger, and an unrestrained sexual pervert engaged in pedophilia, incest, and rape. He authorized deception, assassinations, torture, slavery, and genocide. He was a pirate, not a prophet. According to the Hadith and the Qur'an, Muhammad and his henchmen plundered their way to power and prosperity. And by putting the Qur'an in chronological order and correlating it with the context of Muhammad's life, we find that Allah mirrored his prophet's character. Muhammad's god condoned immoral and criminal behavior. Allah boasts about being a terrorist. He claims to have deceived men, to have stolen their property, to have enslaved women and children, to having committed acts of murder, genocide, and sadistic tortures.”

Craig Winn, Prophet of Doom

Friday, February 15, 2008

Muslims use multiculturalism to strike at our shadow

Western collective guilt has condensed into a blind spot, or shadow, as a kind of highly energized collective complex. In individuals and in the collective, a complex, when highly energized will override the ability of consciousness to think or feel about the reality of the object. The object will become imbued with a highly idealized intellectual or feeling artifice. Multiculturalism now permeates the Western psyche and is the intellectual artifice that has been adapted to mask this collective complex. In consequence most people in the West cannot define or understand Islamic intentions.

Where does this Western collective guilt (excessive self criticism) come from? In the 1960’s the extensive use of psychedelic and other drugs acted as a caustic acid upon inherited cultural foundations and brought about a psychic reversal (Enantiodromia) in that generation that subsequently has come to dominate nearly all Western public institutions. Progressive and deconstructionist movements from the late 1800’s contributed to the build up of counter cultural structures that were ready to re-anchor the culture. Another contributing factor is the de-Christianization of the West that in the early 1900’s both Carl Jung and Rudolph Steiner predicted will be well advanced by the end of the twentieth century.

Muslim psychology. Islamic civilization stands upon a foundation constructed from rules in the Koran and Hadiths and it all comes down to submission to Allah. Not love, not faith, not good works, just submission. It does not foster, in fact it impedes the development of individual conscience as opposed to Christianity which has fostered the development of individual conscience in the West.

Muslims do not think like we do in the West, they think without individual conscience. While our morality and ethics is driven by the need to be and know truth, the Muslims’ is not truth based, it’s a simple morality of that which advances Islam is good and otherwise it’s evil. This is why Muslims make outrageous lies and horrific terrorist attacks and are not embarrassed even when caught. This is why the West makes terrible mistakes, the Western shadow overlaps or is projected onto the Muslim so we want to believe Muslim lies (since they are people too and like us are mostly good and truthful, so we think), we cannot imagine they can be as evil as they are, make excuses for them, and try to blame ourselves.

Expressed another way, we in the West operate with a bipolar morality of good and evil that we admit can be personal and that our conscience must arbitrate, whereas the Muslim operates with a bipolar morality of Muslims are good and the other is evil, without conscience. The morality of the West does not map to the morality of the Muslim. The Muslim very clearly sees the internal conflicted nature of the West and plays upon that conflict. Muslim media disinformation in Yugoslavia in the 1990’s and more recently by Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza are only a few examples of striking at the Western internal conflict. Muslims use multiculturalism and its language to strike at our shadow which is our Achilles Heel.

Secret papers reveal Saudi threats against UK

Secret papers reveal threats from Saudi prince

Spectre of 'another 7/7' led Tony Blair to block bribes inquiry, high court told

This article appeared in the Guardian on Friday February 15 2008 on p1 of the Top stories section. It was last updated at 12:08 on February 15 2008.
Prince Bandar bin sultan bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud

Prince Bandar, head of Saudi Arabia’s national security council, leaving Downing Street last October. Photograph: Martin Argles

Saudi Arabia's rulers threatened to make it easier for terrorists to attack London unless corruption investigations into their arms deals were halted, according to court documents revealed yesterday.

Previously secret files describe how investigators were told they faced "another 7/7" and the loss of "British lives on British streets" if they pressed on with their inquiries and the Saudis carried out their threat to cut off intelligence.

Prince Bandar, the head of the Saudi national security council, and son of the crown prince, was alleged in court to be the man behind the threats to hold back information about suicide bombers and terrorists. He faces accusations that he himself took more than £1bn in secret payments from the arms company BAE.

He was accused in yesterday's high court hearings of flying to London in December 2006 and uttering threats which made the prime minister, Tony Blair, force an end to the Serious Fraud Office investigation into bribery allegations involving Bandar and his family.

The threats halted the fraud inquiry, but triggered an international outcry, with allegations that Britain had broken international anti-bribery treaties.

Lord Justice Moses, hearing the civil case with Mr Justice Sullivan, said the government appeared to have "rolled over" after the threats. He said one possible view was that it was "just as if a gun had been held to the head" of the government.

The SFO investigation began in 2004, when Robert Wardle, its director, studied evidence unearthed by the Guardian. This revealed that massive secret payments were going from BAE to Saudi Arabian princes, to promote arms deals.

Yesterday, anti-corruption campaigners began a legal action to overturn the decision to halt the case. They want the original investigation restarted, arguing the government had caved into blackmail.

The judge said he was surprised the government had not tried to persuade the Saudis to withdraw their threats. He said: "If that happened in our jurisdiction [the UK], they would have been guilty of a criminal offence". Counsel for the claimants said it would amount to perverting the course of justice.

Wardle told the court in a witness statement: "The idea of discontinuing the investigation went against my every instinct as a prosecutor. I wanted to see where the evidence led."

But a paper trail set out in court showed that days after Bandar flew to London to lobby the government, Blair had written to the attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, and the SFO was pressed to halt its investigation.

The case officer on the inquiry, Matthew Cowie, was described by the judge as "a complete hero" for standing up to pressure from BAE's lawyers, who went behind his back and tried to secretly lobby the attorney general to step in at an early stage and halt the investigations.

The campaigners argued yesterday that when BAE failed at its first attempt to stop the case, it changed tactics. Having argued it should not be investigated in order to promote arms sales, it then recruited ministers and their Saudi associates to make the case that "national security" demanded the case be covered up.

Moses said that after BAE's commercial arguments failed, "Lo and behold, the next thing there is a threat to national security!" Dinah Rose, counsel for the Corner House and the Campaign against the Arms Trade, said: "Yes, they start to think of a different way of putting it." Moses responded: "That's very unkind!"

Documents seen yesterday also show the SFO warned the attorney general that if he dropped the case, it was likely it would be taken up by the Swiss and the US. These predictions proved accurate.

Bandar's payments were published in the Guardian and Switzerland subsequently launched a money-laundering inquiry into the Saudi arms deal. The US department of justice has launched its own investigation under the foreign corrupt practices act into the British money received in the US by Bandar while he was ambassador to Washington.

Prince Bandar yesterday did not contest a US court order preventing him from taking the proceeds of property sales out of the country. The order will stay in place until a lawsuit brought by a group of BAE shareholders is decided. The group alleges that BAE made £1bn of "illegal bribe payments" to Bandar while claiming to be a "highly ethical, law-abiding corporation".

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Dhimmi Christians Collect Garbage in Egypt

During a trip to Egypt in the late 1970's Coptic Christians nervously told us about Muslim oppression, but we didn't see what the following 2008 film documents.

Also watch Part Two and Part Three.

(Thanks to Tundra Tabloids)